10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (Host:Michael)

回覆文章
Michael-liu
YOYO member
文章: 708
註冊時間: 週五 4月 24, 2009 6:09 pm

10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (Host:Michael)

文章 Michael-liu »

Who Cares About Politics?
(by Tania Lombrozo, a psychology professor at the University of California, Berkeley.)

The election season is a time of abundance for those who love following politics — each datum, debate or debacle offers new fodder for discussion and commentary. But for those who aren't so keen on politics, a myopic focus on policy and polls can be tiresome.

What accounts for this variation across individuals, from the politically engrossed to the largely apathetic?

There's quite a bit of research on what determines an individual's party affiliation and political positions. But beyond particular views is the more basic question of political interest. Here, too, research reveals some surprising and some not-so-surprising patterns in who cares about politics, at least in the United States.

First, there's evidence that personality matters. One analysis of three distinct data sets, each including hundreds of participants, found that people who were more open to experience (as reflected by traits like curiosity and intelligence) were more likely to show a high level of interest in politics, to report following politics, to be politically informed, and to engage in political discussions. Extraverts were likely to engage in political discussions, but not so likely to be politically informed. More surprisingly, people who were highly conscientious (e.g., organized, responsible) were neither particularly informed nor interested in politics, and those who were highly agreeable (e.g., warm, sympathetic) had a modest but consistent tendency to avoid political matters.

Second, there's evidence that beliefs about government can have a significant influence on a person's political interest. People who believe that government is attentive to public opinion and responsive to the people are more likely to report high levels of interest in politics. This makes a lot of sense — people are more interested when they think that their opinions matter.

Third, there's evidence that demographic factors are associated with political interest. On average, the very young and the very old show less political interest, and the more educated show greater political interest. Political interest is also spread unevenly across political affiliations — data from the PEW Research Center, for example, suggests that "solid liberals" and "steadfast conservatives" are more interested in politics than those who hold more mixed views.

Another demographic characteristic that may be important is gender. An analysis of data from 1984 found that on average, American women reported less interest in politics than American men. This is potentially surprising in light of the fact that women voted at comparable rates to men during that period.

One relevant difference between men and women may be their sense for their own political competence: Women were less likely to believe that they could understand what happens in government and politics, and this belief was associated with lower levels of political interest. Consistent with this idea, an experimental study published earlier this year found that when women's perceived competence was increased, their political interest went up as well.

Another factor affecting women's relative disinterest is the under-representation of women in powerful political positions. A 1997 paper reported mixed but suggestive evidence that the gap between men and women was driven by the perception that "politics is a man's world"; subsequent evidence supports the idea that with qualified female candidates running for office, women become more politically engaged.

Finally, there's evidence that political events can influence political interest, but this influence is surprisingly small. An analysis of multiple datasets across several countries found that a person's level of political interest is relatively stable over time. The exception was in Germany in the period after reunification, suggesting that major political turmoil can lead to flux in general interest, but that by and large a person's level of interest is more affected by her personal characteristics than by the particular political events of the day. Those personal characteristics, in turn, are a mix of both genetic and environmental influences — the very things that influence our personality, beliefs and beyond.

Session 1

1.Do you agree people who are interested in politics are more curious and more intelligent? Do you agree people who avoid political matters are more agreeable (e.g., warm, sympathetic)?

2.Hillary is married with child and has a president husband, while our president-- 蔡英文 is single and not from a political family at all. Does it mean Taiwanese people are more open-minded than American people?

3.“People are more interested when they think that their opinions matter” In Yo Yo’s Line group, most people keep quiet and hardly give their opinions. Is the reason because they think their opinions don’t matter? What are the other possible reasons?

Session 2

1.Who do you think is more likely to win the US presidential election? Trump or Hillary? Why?

2.If Trump gets elected, do you think the world will change in many ways or no difference?

3.Since democracy has became show business and can not gurantee us a good leader, maybe China’s political system, the so-called “meritocracy”(精英政治) is a better solution. They train the potential leader from the bottom, and the leader doesn’t need to get a lot of money for election. The leader doesn’t have to please voters by promising stupid things. What do you think?

********************************************************************************************************************************************
Agenda:
3:45 ~ 4:00pm Greetings & Free Talk / Ordering Beverage or Meal / Getting Newcomer’s Information
4:00 ~ 4:10pm Opening Remarks / Newcomer’s Self-introduction / Grouping
(Session I)
4:10 ~ 4:50pm Discussion Session (40 mins)
4:50 ~ 5:10pm Summarization (20 mins)
5:10 ~ 5:15pm Regrouping / Instruction Giving / Taking a 10 Minutes Break (Intermission)
(Session II)
5:15 ~ 5:55pm Discussion Session (40 mins)
6:00 ~ 6:20pm Summarization (20 mins)
6:20 ~ 6:30pm Concluding Remarks / Announcements ********************************************************************************************************************************************
聚會日期:列於該貼文主題內
聚會時間:請準時 4:00 pm 到 ~ 約 6:30 pm 左右結束
星期六聚會地點:丹堤濟南店
地址、電話:台北市濟南路三段25號 地圖 (02) 2740-2350
捷運站:板南線 忠孝新生站 3 號出口
走法:出忠孝新生站 3 號出口後,沿著巷子(忠孝東路三段10巷)走約 2 分鐘,到了濟南路口,左轉走約 2 分鐘即可看到。
最低消費: 80 元


注意事項:
1. 文章是否需要列印請自行斟酌,但與會者請務必自行列印 Questions for discussion。
2. 與會者請先閱讀過文章,並仔細想過所有的問題,謝謝合作!


給新朋友的話:
1. 請事先準備2~3分鐘的英語自我介紹;會議結束前可能會請你發表1~2分鐘的感想。
2. 請事先閱讀文章以及主持人所提的討論問題,並事先寫下自己所欲發表意見的英文。
3. 全程以英語進行,參加者應具備中等英語會話能力,對任一討論問題,能夠以5到10句英文表達個人見解。
4. 在正式加入之前,可以先來觀摩三次,觀摩者亦須參與討論。正式加入需繳交終身會費 NT$1,000。
最後由 Michael-liu 於 週五 9月 30, 2016 3:43 am 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
頭像
Rock
YOYO member
文章: 2161
註冊時間: 週三 10月 31, 2007 9:03 am

Re: 10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (H:Michael)

文章 Rock »

“The penalty for not participating in politics is to be governed by your inferiors.” :?
頭像
Rock
YOYO member
文章: 2161
註冊時間: 週三 10月 31, 2007 9:03 am

Re: 10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (H:Michael)

文章 Rock »

Michael-liu 寫: 2.Hillary is married with child and has a president husband, while our president-- 蔡英文 is single and not from a political family at all. Does it mean Taiwanese people are more open-minded than American people?
My one cent is:
Tsai has been in the political industry for all her life; her family business doesn't matter any more. Besides, the role of the leader in Chinese culture is superior to the general public. Even up to now, we still don't think we are voting for "one of us", but "one of them". We don't expect this somebody, who is going to rule us, to be like us. They don't have to have a happy family, children, or even a normal personality. Mayor Ko is an example.

It surely doesn't mean that people in Taiwan are more open-minded. Actually, I wonder if it's because we are more openly mindless.
Luis Ko
YOYO member
文章: 970
註冊時間: 週三 6月 06, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: 10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (Host:Michael)

文章 Luis Ko »

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/29/usa-toda ... dency.html

do you guys think it's fine for the media to take sides so obviously in a presidential election in a so-called democratic society?

i don't mean to sound too cocky but, guess i'm not stupid haa.. 8)
i might be a cynic and, a sceptic as well but, i'm definitely not a bad person!!
Michael-liu
YOYO member
文章: 708
註冊時間: 週五 4月 24, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: 10/1(Sat) Who Cares About Politics? (Host:Michael)

文章 Michael-liu »

Luis Ko 寫:http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/29/usa-toda ... dency.html

do you guys think it's fine for the media to take sides so obviously in a presidential election in a so-called democratic society?

i don't mean to sound too cocky but, guess i'm not stupid haa.. 8)
Well....Taking sides is at least better than only one-side story, like the media in China or North Korea.

Anyway, I learned a new phrase from the article, "sense of entitlement"=> 指自以為應得特殊待遇的人
回覆文章