我在一段課程影片裡看到一位老師講了下列句法:
S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
想請問各位高手,這個句法對嗎?
小G不才,沒看過這樣的用法@@
請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
tell 在這裡有 know 或 recognize 的意思,這句話是說Georgia 寫: S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
他知道那隻狗被車撞到。
請參考http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tell
to know something or be able to recognize something because of certain signs that show this
tell (that)
The moment Kramer walked in, I could tell that things were not going well.
Please call me Na'vi!
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
好像例句裡常永用句型是can tell...或 could tell...或用 it is... to tell wh-...chiron 寫:tell 在這裡有 know 或 recognize 的意思,這句話是說Georgia 寫: S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
他知道那隻狗被車撞到。
請參考http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tell
to know something or be able to recognize something because of certain signs that show this
tell (that)
The moment Kramer walked in, I could tell that things were not going well.
Knowledge is power -- when shared.
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
不對喔chiron 寫:tell 在這裡有 know 或 recognize 的意思,這句話是說Georgia 寫: S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
他知道那隻狗被車撞到。
請參考http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tell
to know something or be able to recognize something because of certain signs that show this
tell (that)
The moment Kramer walked in, I could tell that things were not going well.
如果 tell高當作判斷的意思,不會直接放在主詞後面,一定會有住動詞或是不定詞用法。
我從沒看過直接接主詞後面當作「判斷」的意思。
你的例句也和我的結構不一樣,你的例句有助動詞「could」。
我想應該是那位老師講錯了......@@沒有那樣的句型。
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
Yes, I agree with you. That sentence is confusing. No good.
最後由 Rock 於 週五 12月 05, 2008 9:47 pm 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.
- wenhan1122
- Vice President
- 文章: 175
- 註冊時間: 週三 8月 20, 2008 3:29 pm
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tellGeorgia 寫:我在一段課程影片裡看到一位老師講了下列句法:
S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
想請問各位高手,這個句法對嗎?
小G不才,沒看過這樣的用法@@
16. to disclose something secret or private; inform; tattle: She knows who did it, but she won't tell.
So, if the "tell" means inform, the example could be true. The sentence above is similar to "She won't tell (that) who did it.
Just my 2 cents.
The real peace is not merely the absence of warfare, but the presence of justice
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
agree, 若把that引導的子句(到car)當作受次, 這樣就解釋得通ㄌwenhan1122 寫:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tellGeorgia 寫:我在一段課程影片裡看到一位老師講了下列句法:
S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
16. to disclose something secret or private; inform; tattle: She knows who did it, but she won't tell.
So, if the "tell" means inform, the example could be true. The sentence above is similar to "She won't tell (that) who did it.
Just my 2 cents.
Please call me Na'vi!
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
I agree with you!wenhan1122 寫:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tellGeorgia 寫:我在一段課程影片裡看到一位老師講了下列句法:
S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
想請問各位高手,這個句法對嗎?
小G不才,沒看過這樣的用法@@
16. to disclose something secret or private; inform; tattle: She knows who did it, but she won't tell.
So, if the "tell" means inform, the example could be true. The sentence above is similar to "She won't tell (that) who did it.
Just my 2 cents.
隨你所喜
或酒、或詩、或是喜!
或酒、或詩、或是喜!
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
1. 原先不是說tell做 recognize "分辨"解嗎? 怎麼這個例子變成"說出來"(say to someone)呢?chiron 寫:agree, 若把that引導的子句(到car)當作受次, 這樣就解釋得通ㄌwenhan1122 寫:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tellGeorgia 寫:我在一段課程影片裡看到一位老師講了下列句法:
S + tell + (that) + 子句
eg. He told that the dog was hurt by a car.
16. to disclose something secret or private; inform; tattle: She knows who did it, but she won't tell.
So, if the "tell" means inform, the example could be true. The sentence above is similar to "She won't tell (that) who did it.
Just my 2 cents.
2. "She won't tell (that) who did it. 中tell已有wh-帶頭的名詞子句做受詞 不再有(that)了吧...
Knowledge is power -- when shared.
- wenhan1122
- Vice President
- 文章: 175
- 註冊時間: 週三 8月 20, 2008 3:29 pm
Re: 請問這個句法正確嗎?(tell 的用法)
I don't know too much about the grammar, but from the web dictionary aforementioned, it's not necessary to add an objective if the "tell" means inform.Wayne 寫:1. 原先不是說tell做 recognize "分辨"解嗎? 怎麼這個例子變成"說出來"(say to someone)呢?chiron 寫:
agree, 若把that引導的子句(到car)當作受次, 這樣就解釋得通ㄌ
2. "She won't tell (that) who did it. 中tell已有wh-帶頭的名詞子句做受詞 不再有(that)了吧...
The "that" is similar to below examples (補述語句?)
I wonder (that) who the new president is.
I wonder (that) if John went home safely last night.
If we change the "wonder" to "won't tell", they become
I won't tell (that) who the new president is.
I won't tell (that) if John went home safely last night.
The real peace is not merely the absence of warfare, but the presence of justice